Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Wicklund

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 23, 1996No. 36489-8-IPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The trial court prohibited Ward Wicklund from "practic[ing] homosexuality in the sense of exhibiting, or participating in displays of affection . . . with a partner” while caring for his four children. Ward appeals this parenting plan provision. We hold that the trial court erred by restricting Ward’s conduct based on his sexual orientation. The evidence showed only that the children experienced difficulty adjusting after their parents’ separation. But where the only harm is adjustment, the remedy is counseling, not restrictions on the parents’ lifestyle in terms of sexual orientation.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KovacsWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. RundquistCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  3. In Re the Marriage of CabalquintoWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re the Marriage of BergCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. In Re the Marriage of CabalquintoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. In Re Marriage of LittlefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of KatareWashington Supreme Court · 2012
  4. In re the Marriage of ChandolaWashington Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Boswell v. BoswellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API