Broock v. Nutri/System, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY OVERRULING DEFENDANT NUTRI/SYSTEM’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. # 14)
RICE, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on Defendant Nutri/System’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 14), which argues that it cannot be liable to the Plaintiff because, as a matter of law, its franchisee, Defendant Thin, Inc., was not its agent. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that no actual agency relationship existed between Thin, Inc. and Nutri/System at the time of Sharon Broock’s death, but that genuine issues of material fact exist as to whether there was an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pete Bouldis v. U.S. Suzuki Motor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Taylor v. Checkrite, Ltd.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Arnson v. General Motors CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Enterprise Management Consultants, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Bricker v. R & a PIZZA, INC.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Raines v. Shoney's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
- Coleman v. ChenDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
- Ross v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.