Legal Opinion

Irvin v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 25, 1923No. 14683Published

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. “ This court is without authority to entertain an objection to the sufficiency of the approval of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new_ trial, when it does not appear that such objection was raised and insisted upon before the trial judge at the time the motion was entertained by him.” Johnson v. Redwine, 21 Ga. App. 811 (95 S. E. 315); Ga. L. 1911, p. 150, sec. 3; Park’s Code, § 6090 (a). See also Citizens Bank v. Todd, 151 Ga. 478 (107 S. E. 486); Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. Gary, 22 Ga. App. 604 (2) (96 S. E. 711).

2. The evidence to connect the accused with the commission…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Marietta Fertilizer Co. v. GaryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  2. Rayfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  3. Citizens Bank v. ToddSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Johnson v. Redwine Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API