Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Redwine Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 12, 1918No. 8958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Claim; from Fayette superior court — Judge Searcy. May 17, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

1. This court is without authority to entertain an objection to the sufficiency of the approval of the grounds of the amendment to a motion for a new trial, when it does not appear that such objection was raised and insisted upon before the trial judge at the time the motion was entertained by him. Ga. L. 1911, p. 150, see. 3.

2. On the trial of a claim interposed to a levy on certain cotton, it was error to reject evidence offered for the purpose of showing that the defendant in fi. fa., in selling the cotton to the claimant, was acting solely as the delegated agent of his landlord, in whom…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Tuttle & Wakefield v. Exchange BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  2. Carter & Ford v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Georgia State Bank v. HardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Irvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API