Legal Opinion

Mazur v. Washington County Redevelopment Authority

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 2006PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

This case offers a first opportunity to examine the interplay of two statutes, the Sunshine Act 1 and the Tax Increment Financing Act (TIF Act). 2 Edward M. Ma-zur, Jeffrey Bull, and Citizens Against Tax Incremental Financing, an unincorporated association (collectively, Appellants), appeal a decision of the Washington County Court of Common Pleas (trial court) dismissing their complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief under the Sunshine Act. In their complaint, Appellants alleged Appellees’ 3 TIF study committee (TIF Committee) violated the Sunshine Act by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lawrence County v. BrennerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. School Security Services, Inc. v. Duquesne City School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  3. Conners v. West Greene School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. School Security Services, Inc. v. Duquesne City School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5 v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. In re Appeal of Ryan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County2009
  3. MILLER v. GOGGINDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  4. Mazur v. Trinity Area School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API