Legal Opinion
Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 5 v. City of Philadelphia
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided October 21, 1985No. Appeals, Nos. 2240 C.D. 1985 and 2649 C.D. 1985PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
President Judge Crumlish, Jr.,
Before us are appeals of two separate Philadelphia Common Pleas Court orders which, in effect, held that the Mayor of Philadelphia did not exceed the authority of his office in creating the Philadelphia Special Investigation Commission and that the Commission did not violate the Pennsylvania Open Meeting *342Law1 when it adopted its Buies of Conduct for Commission Hearings.
The Fraternal Order of Police, Lodge No. 5 (FOP), initiated the two actions which sought (1) by way of a complaint in equity and accompanying motion for special or preliminary injunction…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Sanders v. BentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1978
- Pennsylvania Interscholastic Athletic Ass'n v. GeisingerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Wightman Health Center v. Office of the TreasurerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mazur v. Washington County Redevelopment AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Ristau v. CaseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Lewiston Daily Sun, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Lewiston Daily Sun, Inc. v. City of AuburnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988
- Ristau v. CaseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994