Estes v. Ashley Hospitality, Inc.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The defendants, John Ashley and Ashley Hospitality, Inc. claim that a letter sent to the plaintiffs attorney in response to a Summons and Complaint constituted an Answer sufficient to withstand a default judgment, or in the alternative, that the Default Judgment should be set aside because of excusable neglect. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Brett Estes sued Ashley and Ashley Hospitality for defaulting on a $50,000 promissory note.1 Ashley formally served a letter on October 24, 2002 on Estes’ attorney. The letter indicated that the defendants were trying to get an attor*472ney…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Peterson v. La CroixSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Eby v. MisarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Roso v. HenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Leighton v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Leighton v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Strutton v. SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES LPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Peters v. BARKER & LITTLE, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Estes v. Ashley Hospitality, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.