Legal Opinion

Estes v. Ashley Hospitality, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEIERHENRY, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The defendants, John Ashley and Ashley Hospitality, Inc. claim that a letter sent to the plaintiffs attorney in response to a Summons and Complaint constituted an Answer sufficient to withstand a default judgment, or in the alternative, that the Default Judgment should be set aside because of excusable neglect. We affirm.

FACTS

[¶ 2.] Brett Estes sued Ashley and Ashley Hospitality for defaulting on a $50,000 promissory note.1 Ashley formally served a letter on October 24, 2002 on Estes’ attorney. The letter indicated that the defendants were trying to get an attor*472ney…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rushmore State Bank v. Kurylas, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Hrachovec v. KaarupSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Peterson v. La CroixSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Eby v. MisarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Roso v. HenningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Leighton v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Leighton v. BennettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Strutton v. SDG MACERICH PROPERTIES LPSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Peters v. BARKER & LITTLE, INC.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Estes v. Ashley Hospitality, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API