Legal Opinion

Leighton v. Bennett

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 2019No. #28626-a-MESPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSalter, Justice

[¶1.] Julie Leighton commenced a personal injury action against Herbert Bennett for injuries she claims to have sustained in a car accident. Bennett died during the pendency of the action, and his defense counsel served notice of his death on Leighton. After Leighton failed to move to substitute Bennett's estate or personal representative, Bennett's counsel moved to dismiss the case. Leighton then moved for substitution, arguing the period for seeking substitution had not yet commenced because Bennett's counsel had not served Bennett's estate or *467 personal representative. The circuit court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Discover Bank v. StanleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Moore v. Michelin Tire Co., Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Grandbouche v. LovellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  2. Abdulrazzak v. S.D. Bd. of Pardons and ParolesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Sacred Heart Health Services v. Yankton CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Interest of A.A., A.T., and A.A.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Matter of Implicated IndividualSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API