Legal Opinion
Leslie v. W.H. Transportation Co.
District Court, S.D. West Virginia
Decided June 16, 2004No. CIV.A. 3:03-2142PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHAMBERS, District Judge.
There are several related motions before the Court. Plaintiffs’ motion (doc. no. 33) to reconsider the December 11, 2003 Order is GRANTED, and the Order (doc. no. 31) is retracted with respect to the Court’s interpretation of the Exhaustion Clause. The Court has considered the issues anew with the benefit of motions for partial summary judgment and supporting memoran-da. After considering the motions and responses, as well as oral argument presented to the Court on January 28,, 2004, the Court DENIES the motion by Defendant State Auto Property & Casualty…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mulholland v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Augustine v. SimonsonMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Gray v. Simonson Farmers Ins. ExcMontana Supreme Court · 1997
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. SaltiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Brown v. USAA Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Lunsford v. MillsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2014