Legal Opinion

Hill v. American Family Mutual Insurance

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided January 5, 2011No. 36311Published

1Opinion of the Court

249 P.3d 812 (2011)

Marcie Rae HILL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, dba American Family Insurance, a foreign insurance corporation licensed to do business in the State of Idaho, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 36311.

Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, May 2010 Term.

January 5, 2011.

Rehearing Denied April 29, 2011.

Johnson Olson Chartered, Pocatello, for Appellant. L. Charles Johnson argued.

Trout, Jones, Gledhill Fuhrman, PA., Boise, for Respondent. Christopher P. Graham argued.

W. JONES, Justice.

I. NATURE OF THE CASE

In this case, an underinsured-motorist claimant asks this…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited97 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API