Wormsley v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Appellant appeals from her conviction, after trial without a jury, for attempted taking property without right, D.C.Code §§ 22-103, -3816 (1981 & 1986 Supp.). Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction. Finding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that she attempted to take and carry away the property of another without the right to do so, we affirm.
At appellant’s trial, the shopkeeper of a small clothing store testified to the following events: Appellant, who was visibly pregnant, entered the store where the shopkeeper worked. The shopkeeper was *1374the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Blackledge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Groomes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
- Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
- Tibbs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Sellers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- Joiner-Die v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re Doe (" Sd")District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- RICHARD C. JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.