Legal Opinion

Wormsley v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1987No. 85-968PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals from her conviction, after trial without a jury, for attempted taking property without right, D.C.Code §§ 22-103, -3816 (1981 & 1986 Supp.). Appellant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support her conviction. Finding the evidence sufficient to support a finding that she attempted to take and carry away the property of another without the right to do so, we affirm.

At appellant’s trial, the shopkeeper of a small clothing store testified to the following events: Appellant, who was visibly pregnant, entered the store where the shopkeeper worked. The shopkeeper was *1374the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Groomes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Tibbs v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Sellers v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Evans v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Joiner-Die v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  3. In Re Doe (" Sd")District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. RICHARD C. JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. Smith v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API