Groomes v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROVER, Chief Judge.
A jury convicted appellant of petit larceny. Code 1951, § 22-2202 (Supp. VII). Assigning as error (1) the denial of motions properly made for judgment of acquittal; and (2) the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, appellant contends that the Government’s proof failed to establish a taking and carrying away of the property involved.
The Government’s evidence disclosed the following: While shopping in a self-service market, appellant was seen by a clerk to remove two articles from a shelf and put them in her purse which was inside a cart which contained some…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- People v. BradovichMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
- Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- People v. LardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
- The People v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. OlivoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Rouse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. JesserIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Carter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
- Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.