Legal Opinion

Groomes v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1959No. 2409PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVER, Chief Judge.

A jury convicted appellant of petit larceny. Code 1951, § 22-2202 (Supp. VII). Assigning as error (1) the denial of motions properly made for judgment of acquittal; and (2) the insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, appellant contends that the Government’s proof failed to establish a taking and carrying away of the property involved.

The Government’s evidence disclosed the following: While shopping in a self-service market, appellant was seen by a clerk to remove two articles from a shelf and put them in her purse which was inside a cart which contained some…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  2. People v. BradovichMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Loch Et Ux. v. Confair Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. People v. LardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1921
  5. The People v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1936

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. OlivoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Rouse v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. State v. JesserIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Carter v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2010
  5. Singletary v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API