Legal Opinion

Limberg v. Glenwood Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1899No. S.F. No. 1229PublishedCited by 23 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and from an order denying a new trial. M. H. Hyland, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment and order denying a motion for a new trial. The action is one for damages for personal injuries, and arises upon the following state of facts, as testified to hy the plaintiff and his witnesses:

Plaintiff was a teamster of experience, forty-one years of age. He was hired hy defendant to haul lumber with a wagon and four horses. He continued in this employment for a period of eleven months; then, while traveling upon the public road with his loaded wagon, he fell therefrom beneath the wheels, and the loss of a leg was the result. He asserts negligence upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Virginia v. RivesSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Turner v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Eureka Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hatfield v. Levy BrothersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Rase v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Gorman v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Helling v. SchindlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co. v. CartledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API