Legal Opinion

Wirtz v. Modern Trashmoval, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 23, 1963No. Nos. 8828-8839PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOREMAN, Circuit Judge.

I

FACTUAL BACKGROUND(a) Court Proceedings.

These appeals involve three actions-brought in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland by the Secretary of Labor under the Fair Labor Standards Act,1 herein called the Act. In case No. 8828 the Secretary sought an injunction against violations of the wage and record-keeping requirements of the Act by Modern Trash-moval, Inc. (herein referred to as defend-*453P. E. ant or Modern) and Francis Bohager, its president2 In cases Nos. 8829 and 8830 the Secretary sought to recover from Modern unpaid compensation alleged…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Arnold v. Ben Kanowsky, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. A. H. Phillips, Inc. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. McLeod v. ThrelkeldSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. WirtzSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Turner v. Human Genome Sciences, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2003
  3. Mays v. Midnite Dreams, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2018
  4. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Jack WardlawCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  5. Mays v. Midnite DreamsNebraska Supreme Court · 2018

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API