Legal Opinion

Fuchs v. SpecialtyCare, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided September 26, 2025No. 3:23-cv-00892Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NATHAN FUCHS et al., ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 3:23-cv-00892 ) CHIEF JUDGE CAMPBELL SPECIALTYCARE, INC., ) MAGISTRATE JUDGE HOLMES ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Nathan Fuchs’ (“Fuchs”) and Caitlin Bailey’s (“Bailey,” collectively “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Rule 23 Class Certification (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 128) to which Defendant SpecialtyCare, Inc. (“SpecialtyCare”) has filed an Opposition (Doc. No. 144), and Plaintiffs have filed a Reply (Doc. No. 147). For…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust FundsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Tyson Foods, Inc. v. BouaphakeoSupreme Court of the United States · 2016

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API