City of Santa Ana v. Gildmacher
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Action to condemn right of way for sewer. Defendant Jacobson was a tenant of defendant Gildmacher, and made default. Defendant Gildmacher answered. At the close of the evidence, the jury, on motion of defendant Gildmacher and by direction of the court, rendered a verdict that there was no necessity for taking the property described in the complaint, and judgment was entered accordingly. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment and from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The complaint sets forth with sufficient particularity the location, general route,- and termini of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- People v. WelchCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- In re SpencerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Levitzky v. CanningCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- State v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911
- State Highway Commission v. Yost Farm CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1963
- Blackwell v. American Film Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Minnesota Canal & Power Co. v. Fall Lake Boom Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.