State Highway Commission v. Yost Farm Company
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles
This is an action in eminent domain by the State against three parties owning property. Separate judgments were entered in each action, but by stipulation the actions were tried together and are being appealed together. Therefore, we shall treat the defendants as one and refer to them collectively as respondent.
The action was brought to condemn land for use in constructing a highway designated as the “North Frontage Road of the new Montana Interstate.” The complaint was the usual interstate highway condemnation complaint, reciting that the Highway Commission had adopted an amended resolution…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Spring Valley Water Works v. DrinkhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Butte, Anaconda & Pacific Railway Co. v. Montana Union Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. PetersonMontana Supreme Court · 1958
- Teesdale v. Anschutz Drilling CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Spencer v. RobertsonMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Montana Power Company v. BokmaMontana Supreme Court · 1969
- Montana Ass'n of Underwriters v. State Ex Rel. Department of AdministrationMontana Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. Crossen-Nissen Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.