Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. Kansas City Hydraulic Press Brick Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. W. 0. Thomas, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
TRIMBLE, J. —
Suit on special tax bills for paving with asphalt a business street in Kansas City.
The answer set up nine separate and distinct defenses. Some of these were concluded by the verdict of the jury in plaintiff’s favor. The others, when carefully analyzed, are found to contain really but four matters of defense, some stating the same defense twice in a different way.
On motion of the plaintiff, the court struck out the third, fourth, fifth, sixth and seventh defenses before entering upon the trial. And we are asked to review this action along with other errors claimed.
We shall first…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Verdin v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. UllmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Neill v. GatesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Heman v. GilliamMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Missouri Electric Power Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
- Heman Construction Co. v. LyonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1919
- Bremerton Municipal League v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Perkins v. City of PawhuskaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Town of Tonawanda v. Stapell, Mumm & Beals Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1933