Legal Opinion

Engstrom v. Canadian Northern Ry. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 9, 1923No. 6324PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TRIEBER, District Judge.

The plaintiff, as administrator of the estate of Andrew Anderson, deceased, instituted this action in a district court of the Fourteenth judicial district for the county of Roseau, state of Minnesota, against the defendant in error and the Minnesota & Manitoba Railroad Company to recover damages by reason of injuries received by his intestate resulting in his death, caused by the defendant’s negligently striking an automobile in which he was riding as a guest of one Neis Engstrom. The particular facts set out in the complaint are:

“That the said Neis Engstrom attempted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Remington v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Brommer v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1910
  3. Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Bradley v. Missouri Pac. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1923
  5. Lynde v. the CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1873

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parrent v. Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  2. Grant v. Chicago Etc. Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kelley's Adm'r v. AbramDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1937
  4. Hartman v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API