Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided February 23, 1940No. 58-WPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BAKER, District Judge.

The undisputed facts in this case, insofar as the same are pertinent to the question now before this Court, are as follows:

George F. C. Hartman, the plaintiff, upon November 21, 1939, caused a summons to be issued in the Circuit Court of Monongalia County, West Virginia, returnable to December Rules, 1939. At December Rules, the plaintiff filed his declaration against the defendant, in the office of the Circuit Clerk of Monongalia County. On January 3, 1940, being the last Rule Day of the January Rules, at about five o’clock, p. m., Frank R. Amos, an attorney of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lynde v. the CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Williams v. New York, P. & NR Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
  3. In re Von BorckeDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1899
  4. People's Sav. Bank & Trust Co. v. Batchelder Egg Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1892
  5. State v. Crosley Park Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Dienstag v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API