Legal Opinion
McKee v. Orange Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 2003No. G030931PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FYBEL, J.
Richard R McKee appeals from the trial court’s order denying his petition for entry of a writ of mandate based on the Orange Unified School District’s (OUSD) alleged violations of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act), Government Code section 54950 et seq. (All further statutory references are to the Government Code.) The trial court denied McKee’s petition because he “lacks standing to maintain this action as he is not a resident of the County of Orange and therefore, is not an ‘interested person,’ within the meaning of Government Code Sections 54960 or 54960.1.”
We conclude a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Common Cause v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People ex rel. Lungren v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Sacramento Newspaper Guild, Local 92 v. Sacramento County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's Union v. Los Angeles Export Terminal, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1999
- Woodward Park Homeowners Ass'n v. Garreks, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Raining Data Corp. v. BarrenecheaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- IBM Personal Pension Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Nordstrom Commission CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Shapiro v. BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF CCDCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Mansur v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.