Commonwealth v. Simpson
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from an order denying relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act.- 1 The issue is whether appellant should be granted a new trial because the guilty plea colloquy was defective. The plea was entered as the result of a plea bargain. The record shows that had counsel informed appellant that the colloquy was defective, appellant would not have withdrawn his plea and gone to trial, but would have accepted the bargain. In these circumstances, we affirm.
On December 18, 1972, appellant was arrested and charged with larceny, receiving stolen property, possession of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Commonwealth v. ChumleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. DilbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Commonwealth v. KulpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. NewellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BurnoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Commonwealth v. MiddletonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. TanurSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. TylerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. BurnoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.