Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Tanur

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 16, 1981No. 1077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order denying relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act 1 without a hearing. The issues are whether the guilty plea colloquy was defective, and if so, whether appellant should be granted a new trial. The plea was entered as the result of a plea bargain. We find that the colloquy was defective. Because the record does not reveal whether the plea bargain was favorable and whether appellant understood and was satisfied to accept it rather than go to trial, we remand for an evidentiary hearing.

Appellant was charged with twenty counts of theft by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IngramSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth v. MusiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  3. Commonwealth v. WillisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Commonwealth v. DilbeckSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. KulpSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. AnthonySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API