Legal Opinion

Frey v. Nakles

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 14, 1955No. Appeal, 229PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Chidsey,

This action in assumpsit was brought by Lewis A. Frey and Jen tila T. Frey, his wife, the vendees in a written agreement for the sale of a hotel and restaurant business, against the defendants, Elias S. Nakles and Latife Nakles, his wife, the vendors, to recover damages on account of the failure of the defendants to convey the business in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The plaintiffs claimed as damages a down payment of fl,000, received by the defendants on the execution of the agreement, expenses incurred in reliance on the contract and anticipated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harman Et Ux. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  2. Seidlek v. BradleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Wilkinson v. North East BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
  4. Kargiatly v. Provident Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Bartram v. HeringSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Empire Properties, Inc. v. Equireal, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Schneider v. Albert Einstein Medical Center, Northern DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Tri-State Refining & Investment Co. v. Apaloosa Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Dempsey v. StaufferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962
  5. Dempsey v. StaufferDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API