Legal Opinion

Hendershot v. Carey

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided July 7, 1993No. 27A02-9202-CV-77PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge.

James Hendershot, Tom Rotz, Barbara Hargis, and Teresa Neal, as representative plaintiffs in a class action on behalf of the employees (the class will hereinafter collectively be referred to as the "Employees") of the City of Muncie and of the Muncie Sanitary District (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "City"), appeal from the trial court's judgment that the City did not wrongfully withhold wages from the Employees in 1988.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings.

Upon appeal, the Employees present five issues for our review, which we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. RendlemanIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Dunn v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Gurnik v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Sherk v. Indiana Waste Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Communications Workers of America, Locals 5800, 5714 v. BeckmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. St. Vincent Hospital & Health Care Center, Inc. v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Naugle v. Beech Grove City SchoolsIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Huff v. BIOMET, INC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Braddock v. Madison County, Ind.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998
  5. Haxton v. McClure Oil Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1998

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API