Legal Opinion

J. W. Crowdus Drug Co. v. Van Doren

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 20, 1926No. 16407PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAY, C. J. W.

Crowdus Drug Company sued G. P. Van Doren, P. A. Baza, and D. E. Cantrell, to recover on a number of promissory notes. The defendant Baza was not served with summons. Van Doren filed no demurrer, answer, or other pleading. The defendant Cantrell answered, in substance, that about) September, 1914, the defendant Van Doren was engaged in the retail drug business in the town of Hewitt, and in failing circumstances, the Crowdus Drug Company being the ‘ principal creditor; that the defendant Cantrell was a practicing physician and surgeon in that community, with headquarters…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. J. W. Crowdus Drug Co. v. Van DorenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. HansonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  2. Ballard v. Yellow Cab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Wistar v. WhitewingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API