Legal Opinion

Fidelity Union Casualty Co. v. Hanson

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 6, 1932No. 1492—5768PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

This case is the sequel to the case of Hanson et al. v. Haymann et al. (Tex. Civ. App.) 280 S. W. 889. The judgment recovered by Barbara Haymann and her -minor children against P. E1. Hanson was affirmed, and the judgment against the Fidelity Union Casualty Company, which was in favor of plaintiffs for $5,000 of the $12,000 judgment against Planson, was reversed and rendered on the ground that there was no privity of contract between the Haymanns and the Fidelity Union Casualty Company.

In this case P. E. Hanson, as plaintiff, sued the Fidelity Union Casualty Company, as defendant, to recover…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Humphrey v. TatmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Texas Trunk Railway Co. v. Jackson Bros.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. Dimock v. Revere Copper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  5. Sibley v. NasonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Brown v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  2. In the Matter of James T. Bohart, Bankrupt. The Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York v. James T. BohartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  3. State Ex Rel. Bumgarner v. SimsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Coppedge v. ClintonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  5. Nowell v. NowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API