Legal Opinion
Tate v. Booe
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 1857PublishedCited by 14 opinions
APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court. ‘
1Opinion of the Court
Davison, J.. John B. Tate sued Wilson Limpus, George Booe and Lewis Me Cormaclc upon a bond, in the penalty of 3,000 dollars. The bond is dated December the 24th, 1852, and is conditioned as follows:
“Whereas, Wilson Limpus has this day purchased all the *14right, title and interest of John B. Tate, in and to the clothing establishment heretofore conducted by them, (Limpus and Tate,) in Gonnersville, Indiana, as partners, and has individually assumed the payment of all the debts contracted by them as such partners, or by either of them on account of the partnership: Now, therefore, if the said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chace v. HinmanNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- Churchill v. HuntNew York Supreme Court · 1846
- Port v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
- Rockfeller v. DonnellyCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1826
3Cited by14 opinions
- Tracy v. HacketIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- Devol v. McIntoshIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Mahoney v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Hacker v. BlakeIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Bodkin v. MeritIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.