Legal Opinion

Howting-Robinson Associates, Inc. v. Bryan Custom Plastics

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 9, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-74470PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TAYLOR, District Judge.

I. BACKGROUND

On July 20, 1992, Howting Robinson (“HRA”) and United Screw and Bolt (“US & B”), an automotive components manufacturer, entered a sales representation agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, HRA would solicit and obtain sales contracts for U.S. & B. In March, 1996, this agreement was renegotiated and, consequently, the parties entered a new agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, U.S. & B agreed to pay HRA a 3.25% commission on the sales of several components from April 1,1996 until December 31, 2000. US & B further agreed to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Chrysler Corp. v. Skyline Industrial Services, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Martino v. Cottman Transmission Systems, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Walters v. Bloomfield Hills FurnitureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Banek Incorporated v. Yogurt Ventures U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Linsell v. Applied Handling, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. John Hardy v. Reynolds and Reynolds CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Muqtadir v. Micro Contacts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. Morrison v. Unum Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API