Legal Opinion

Sunset Lumber Co. v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1928No. Docket No. 6087PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON, P. J., pro tem.

The appellant, Sunset Lumber Company, a corporation, brought this action to foreclose a lien upon the property of respondents, Charles Locke Paddon and Evalynne D. Paddon, for building materials furnished by it and used in the construction of a dwelling-house owned by said respondents in the city of Watsonville.

This action was consolidated with seven other actions of a similar character, and tried by the court without a jury, and the court rendered judgment in favor of appellant and against the contractor, E. Porter Smith, for $4,345.26, the full amount of appellant’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Alturas School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  2. Callan v. Empire State Surety Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Fickling v. JackmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Terry v. Southwestern Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Holmes Tuttle Lincoln-Mercury, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  2. Culbertson v. CizekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Simpson v. BergmannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Pacific States Electric Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  5. Bekins Moving & Storage Co v. Maryland Cas. Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API