Chapman v. American Rio Grande Land & Irr. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtEly, C. J.
This is a suit by defendant in error, hereinafter designated Company, to recover of plaintiff in error, herein called Chapman, and M. E. France, the sum of $1,753.33, charges for water on four separate tracts of land lying contiguous to its irrigation canals. Chapman filed a cross-action for damages caused by. the seepage of water upon his land from the canals of the Company. The court sustained exceptions to the cross-action and it was dismissed. The cause was then tried by Jury, and upon their verdict judgment was rendered against Chapman for $1,014.48, due on a contract made by him with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Edinburg Irr. Co. v. PaschenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Edinburg Irr. Co. v. PaschenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Louisiana Rio Grande Canal Co. v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clear Lake Apartments, Inc. v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Gavin v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- City of Wichita Falls v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942
- Combs v. United Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Clear Lake Apartments, Inc. v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.