Edinburg Irr. Co. v. Paschen
Texas Commission of Appeals
Error to Court of Civil Appeals of Fourth Supreme Judicial District. Suit by William E. Paschen and others against the Edinburg Irrigation Company. Prom a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (223 S. W. 329) affirming an order awarding preliminary mandatory writ of injunction, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcCDENDON, P. J.
We have in this case for review a judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals, which affirmed an interlocutory order of the district court awarding a mandatory writ of injunction requiring the plaintiff in error to furnish to defendants in error water to irrigate certain lands during the pendency of the suit, upon compliance by the latter with certain requirements of the order. The controlling question in the case is whether the irrigation company, which purchased the irrigation system under receiver’s sale, acquired the irrigation plant free from the water rights which defendants in error had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Davis v. GraySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Stanislaus Water Co. v. BachmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Allen v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Dunlap v. SoutherlinTexas Supreme Court · 1885
- Texas Trunk Ry. Co. v. Lewis, SheriffTexas Supreme Court · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Carey v. LooneyTexas Supreme Court · 1923
- West v. GiesenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Hardy v. McCullochCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- State v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. EighteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Edinburg Irr. Co. v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.