Legal Opinion

City of Wichita Falls v. Bruner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1942No. 14429PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPEER, Justice.

L. B. Bruner and about sixty others, to whom we shall refer as plaintiffs, for themselves and all other persons whose interests were,similar, instituted this suit against the City of Wichita Falls, to which we shall refer as City, and Wichita County Water Improvement District No. 1, to which we shall refer as Improvement District, for a mandatory injunction to require defendants to open a gate or lock in an irrigation canal leading from what is commonly known as Lake Wichita, which canal conveys water from the lake to the vicinity of plaintiffs’ irrigable land, and to enjoin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Texas Co. v. BurkettTexas Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Edinburg Irr. Co. v. PaschenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
  3. Chapman v. American Rio Grande Land & Irr. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Reeves v. Pecos County Water Improvement Dist. No. 1Texas Commission of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. BrunerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  2. El Paso County Water Improvement District No. 1 v. City of El PasoDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1955
  3. City of San Antonio v. Guadalupe-Blanco River AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1987
  5. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API