Legal Opinion
SkinMedica, Inc. v. Histogen Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided April 23, 2012No. Case No. 09-CV-122 JLS (RBB)PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[REDACTED] ORDER
JANIS L. SAMMARTINO, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are several motions for summary judgment of various claims and counterclaims brought by both parties, as well as SkinMedica’s motion for final judgment under Rule 54(b), and Histogen’s motion for attorneys’ fees. Having considered the parties’ arguments and the law. the Court rules as follows:
1. SkinMedica’s motion for partial summary judgment (ECF No. 196) is GRANTED.
2. Histogen’s motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 211) is DENIED.
3. SkinMedica’s motion for final judgment (ECF No. 237) is DENIED.
4. Histogen’s…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Broker Genius, Inc. v. ZaltaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
- Estakhrian v. ObenstineDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2017
- Masimo Corp. v. Sotera Wireless, Inc. (In re Sotera Wireless, Inc.)District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- 3D Systems, Inc. v. WynneDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
- Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc. v. Global Aerospace, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.