Legal Opinion

United States v. General Motors Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided March 25, 1960PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERLANDS, District Judge.

Motion by defendant for transfer to the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, and for a stay. Motion by plaintiff for production of documents.

In this action under Section 7 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 18, the Government charges that General Motors violated that antimerger section by its 1953 acquisition of the stock and subsequently transferred assets of Euclid Road Machinery Company.

Euclid then was one of the leading producers of off-highway earth-moving equipment. Although General Motors did not manufacture off-highway earth-moving equipment prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Koster v. (American) Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Norwood v. KirkpatrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. Ryan. Ferguson v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  5. United States v. Bethlehem Steel CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. New York Marine & General Insurance v. Lafarge North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  2. Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers National Fund v. Baylor Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988
  3. Polaroid Corporation v. CasselmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  4. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Page Airways, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  5. Erving v. Virginia Squires Basketball ClubDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1972

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API