Legal Opinion
United States v. Bethlehem Steel Corporation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 20, 1958PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEINFELD, District Judge.
The Government seeks to enjoin a proposed merger between the defendants, Bethlehem Steel Corporation and The Youngstown Sheet and Tube Company, on the ground that it would violate section 7 of the Clayton Act, as amended. 1
Under the proposed merger Bethlehem is to acquire all the assets and properties of Youngstown pursuant to an agreement between them entered into on December 11, 1956. Prior to the execution of the agreement the defendants applied to the Department of Justice for clearance 2 and submitted in support of their request detailed data pertaining to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Hamilton Watch Co. v. Benrus Watch Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Brown Shoe Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- George R. Whitten, Jr., Inc., D/B/A Whitten Corporation v. Paddock Pool Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Jerrold Electronics CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.