Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nix v. Dunavant

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 14, 1970No. 5-5403Published

1DissentJohn A. Fogleman, Justice

I disagree with the majority because I think that there was substantial evidence to support the findings of the trial judge.

Appellee alleged that he did not, at any time material, transact any business in this state or contract to supply services or things in this state and was not subject to service of process.

Whenever the trial judge decides any fact question, in a law case, either interlocutory or preliminary to trial, his decision will be sustained on appeal if there is any substantial evidence to support it. Rome v. Ahlert, 231 Ark. 844, 332 S. W. 2d 809. Whenever the law makes a circuit…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Grobark v. Addo MacHine Co., Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Harvey C. Orton and Theodore J. Isaacs v. Woods Oil and Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  3. Nelson v. BusbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
  4. Insured Lloyds v. MayoSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Saletko v. Willys Motors, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API