Doherty & Co. v. Youngblut
Supreme Court of Colorado
Action for the return of irrigation district bonds. Judgment for plaintiffs. Error to the District Court of Morgan County, Hon. H. P. Burke, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Denison
The facts in this case are substantially the same as those in 9450, Doherty, et al., v. Steele, et al., 71 Colo. 33, 204 Pac. 77, the only difference being in names and amounts. The decree was substantially like that in the. latter case.
There are many points argued, most of which are the same as in Doherty v. Steele, and are covered in the opinion therein. We notice here a few of them:
That the plaintiff had no right to bring the action on behalf of the district. This is answered in the opinion in the Steele case. The district itself was a party below and appears here, and asks' the relief…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Doherty & Co. v. SteeleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1922
3Cited by3 opinions
- Weed v. Lyons Petroleum Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1923
- Casco Mercantile & Trust Co. v. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1924
- East Denver Municipal Irr. Dist. v. DohertyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1923