Legal Opinion
Minnesota Wood Specialties, Inc. v. George S. May Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided January 14, 1954No. Civ. A. No. 2506PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONOVAN, District Judge.
The above-entitled matter came on for hearing on motion of defendant to set aside service of summons.
This action, commenced in Ramsey County Minnesota District Court, was transferred to this Court for diversity of citizenship.
The issue presented concerns the validity of service. Defendant is a partnership. Service was made by leaving a copy of the summons with the Secretary of State of the State of Minnesota, as provided by 32 Minnesota Statutes Annotated, § 540.152.
Defendant contends that the only means provided for the purpose of effecting the service in the instant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. Louisiana the Louisiana Boundary CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Buder v. BeckerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. RitholzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Danov v. ABC Freight Forwarding Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1963