Arnold A. Smith and Rachael Smith, His Wife, and Herbert Smith and Evelyn Smith, His Wife v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
Herbert and Arnold Smith, together with their respective wives, commenced this suit in the District Court against the United States to recover damages for the use of their warehouse. Jurisdiction was invoked under the Tucker Act. 1 The matter is here on the appeal of the United States from a judgment for the Smiths.
The facts are undisputed. On May 8, 1964, United States Internal Revenue Service executed a distraint warrant for unpaid taxes owing by Lichty Printing and Business Forms, Inc. Levy was made upon Lichty printing presses and other equipment in Smiths’ building, which Lichty had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arnold A. Smith and Rachael Smith, His Wife, and Herbert Smith and Evelyn Smith, His Wife v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Niagara Falls Bridge Commission v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948
- Feldwin Realty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Carroll v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1964
- Feldwin Realty Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
3Cited by6 opinions
- CITY & COUNTY OF DENVER, ETC. v. BerglandDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981
- United States v. 110-118 Riverside Tenants CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- American Oil Company v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1974
- Baddour, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Mississippi · 1985
- Marrano v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.