Legal Opinion

Arnold A. Smith and Rachael Smith, His Wife, and Herbert Smith and Evelyn Smith, His Wife v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 6, 1966No. 20359PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Proceeding under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(a) (2), Arnold A. Smith and Herbert Smith, and their wives, brought this action against the United States to recover $7,470 for the taking, use and occupancy of plaintiffs’ warehouse and office buildings in Phoenix, Arizona.

We summarize the pertinent allegations of the amended complaint: Until May 8, 1964, and prior thereto, plaintiffs had leased the premises to Lichty Printing and Business Forms, Inc., for a rental of $1,350 a month or $45 a day. By that date the lessee had been in default for a number of months in the monthly payments called…

2Cited by18 opinions

  1. McFadden v. American Oil Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  2. Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
  3. Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  4. In Re Sapolin Paints, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
  5. Ghandi v. Police Department of City of DetroitCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API