Legal Opinion

Mayo v. Lichtenwalner

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 14, 1989No. Appeal No. 10 T.D. 1988PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Barry,

William R. Mayo (Plaintiff) appeals an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County sustaining the preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer of two defendants; Charles Crawford and the Department of Agriculture (Defendants). We affirm in part on grounds different from the trial court’s; vacate in part and remand.

The Plaintiff was the owner of two Rottweiler dogs. His amended complaint alleges that on October 21, 1985, his dogs were lured by Defendant Lichtenwalner’s cats onto the defendant’s property and from there into the Defendant’s barn. The complaint…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. DelConte v. StefonickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. AurestoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. County of Allegheny v. DominijanniCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Bahian v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Jefferson Memorial Park v. West Jefferson Hills School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Feldman v. HoffmanCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Donovan v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Montgomery Hospital v. Medical Professional Liability Catastrophe Loss FundCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Winkler v. PennsylvaniaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. H.M. Robinson, Jr. v. L.S. Folino, and CO1 Gillis, sued in their individual capacitiesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API