Commonwealth, Department of Environmental Resources v. Auresto
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
McDERMOTT, Justice.
This appeal is from the order of the Commonwealth Court reversing the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Pike County, 490 A.2d 492. The trial court held that the owner immunity granted by the Recreational Use of Land and Water Act1 (hereinafter Recreation Act) was applicable to the Commonwealth. We agree with the trial court’s holding and therefore reverse the decision of the Commonwealth Court.
Appellee, Anthony Auresto, was injured on February 10, 1982, when the snowmobile he was riding hit a snow covered tree stump on Peck’s Pond, Pike County. Peck’s Pond is…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mayle v. Pennsylvania Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Auresto v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
3Cited by34 opinions
- Conway v. Town of WiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Monteville v. Terrebonne Par. Con. Gov'tSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1990
- Walsh v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Gallo v. Yamaha Motor Corp., USASupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Mills v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.