United States v. Rick
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
ARROWOOD, Judge:
The accused pleaded guilty to two specifications of absence without leave, violations of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886.
First, appellate defense counsel contend that the accused’s pretrial confinement was unlawful since the record of trial was devoid of any indication that the accused was afforded a pretrial confinement hearing. Courtney v. Williams, 1 M.J. 267 (C.M.A.1976). No objection was made at trial concerning either pretrial confinement or the pretrial confinement hearing. The trial court was the appropriate forum for litigating…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- Courtney v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
- United States v. SlatonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. HastonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
- United States v. McLeskeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
- United States v. TrakowskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
- United States v. FolkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993