Legal Opinion

United States v. Rick

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 30, 1980No. ACM S24895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

ARROWOOD, Judge:

The accused pleaded guilty to two specifications of absence without leave, violations of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 886.

First, appellate defense counsel contend that the accused’s pretrial confinement was unlawful since the record of trial was devoid of any indication that the accused was afforded a pretrial confinement hearing. Courtney v. Williams, 1 M.J. 267 (C.M.A.1976). No objection was made at trial concerning either pretrial confinement or the pretrial confinement hearing. The trial court was the appropriate forum for litigating…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. WheelerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. Courtney v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  3. United States v. CookUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. JonesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. SlatonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HastonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. McLeskeyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  3. United States v. TrakowskiU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  4. United States v. FolkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API