Kaukas v. City of Chicago
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Solfisburg
The plaintiffs, Adolph Kaukas and Vera Kaukas, who were owners of an apartment building in Chicago, filed suit in the superior court of Cook County seeking a declaratory judgment holding that section 78 — 15.9(b) of the Chicago Municipal Code, which prohibited the use of glass panel doors as a secondary means of exist, was invalid. The trial court entered a judgment holding that the ordinance was invalid as applied to buildings in which glass panel doors had been legally installed under the provisions of previous ordinances. The trial judge certified that the validity of a municipal ordinance…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Goldblatt v. Town of HempsteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Queenside Hills Realty Co. v. SaxlSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Adamec v. PostNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- City of Seattle v. HinckleyWashington Supreme Court · 1905
- Abbate Bros., Inc. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
3Cited by15 opinions
- Alarm Detection Systems, Inc. v. Village of HinsdaleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001
- City of Evanston v. RobbinsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Gibbons v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1966
- Eggert v. Board of AppealsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
- City of Chicago v. SheridanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.