City of Seattle v. Hinckley
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Griffin, J., entered April 12, 1905, upon stipulated facts, acquitting the defendant of the violation of a municipal ordinance respecting fire escapes, upon an appeal from a conviction in a justice’s court.
1Opinion of the CourtDunbar, J.
The city of Seattle, appellant in this ease, instituted a criminal action against the defendant and respondent for the violation of a certain ordinance of the said city of Seattle. The respondent was tried and convicted in a police court, and fined in the sum of $50. Hpon appeal to the superior court, the case being submitted upon a statement of facts, tbe respondent was acquitted. Tbe essential *469part of the ordinance the violation of which is charged is as follows:
“That all hotels, office buildings, factories, tenements, and lodging houses, more than three stories in height, shall have at the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- City of Buffalo v. . ChadeayneNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Commonwealth v. RobertsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
3Cited by36 opinions
- Juanita Bay Valley Community Ass'n v. City of KirklandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Mission Springs Inc. v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Hass v. City of KirklandWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Ford v. Bellingham-Whatcom County District Board of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
- Christianson v. Snohomish Health Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.