Hooper v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DALLY, Commissioner.
Appellant was convicted by a jury for resisting arrest, a violation of V.T.C.A. Penal Code, Sec. 38.03. The jury assessed punishment of 90 days in jail.
The record is before us without a transcription of the court reporter’s notes. Although a docket entry in the record reflects that appellant is represented by retained counsel on appeal, no brief was filed in appellant’s behalf pursuant to Art. 40.09(9), V.A.C.C.P. There is no claim of indigency. Nevertheless, we find in the record unassigned error which should be reviewed in the interest of justice under Art.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Argersinger v. HamlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
3Cited by8 opinions
- Empy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Eason v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Starks v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2008
- Empy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Empy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.