Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Unocal Corp.
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided October 31, 2011No. 09SC668Published
1Opinion of the Court
262 P.3d 874 (2011)
Richard JACKSON; Mary Jackson; Thomas Fehringer; Deborah Hradecky; Robert Hradecky; Dean Lousberg; and Lousberg Partnership, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Petitioners.
v.
UNOCAL CORPORATION, Union Oil Company of California, and Unocal Pipeline Company, Respondents.
No. 09SC668.
Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.
October 31, 2011.
The Hannon Law Firm, LLC, Kevin S. Hannon, Justin D. Blum, Denver, Colorado, Inman Flynn Biesterfeld & Brentlinger, P.C., Richard P. Brentlinger, Eric Voogt, Denver, Colorado, Attorneys for Petitioners.
Holland & Hart LLP, John A.…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.