Legal Opinion
Kilby v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.
California Supreme Court
Decided April 4, 2016No. S215614PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CORRIGAN, J
The Ninth Circuit has certified questions 1 involving California wage order requirements that an employer provide suitable seating for employees under certain circumstances. The wage orders at issue here state that ‘“[a]ll working employees shall be provided with suitable seats when the nature of the work reasonably permits the use of seats.” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, §§ 11040, subd. 14(A) (Wage Order No. 4-2001), 11070, subd. 14(A) (Wage Order No. 7-2001).) We frame the Ninth Circuit’s questions as follows. 2(1) Does the phrase ‘“nature of the work” refer to individual…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Christopher v. Smithkline Beecham Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2012
- Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
- Arias v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009
- Martinez v. CombsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Dynamex Operations W., Inc. v. Superior Court of L. A. Cnty.California Supreme Court · 2018
- Augustus v. ABM Security ServicesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
- Mendoza v. Nordstrom, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Gomez v. J. Jacobo Farm Labor Contractor, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Marquez v. City of Long Beach, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.