State v. Dlugi
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted, tried in tbe district court for tbe county of Morrison before Nye, J., and a jury, and convicted of tbe crime of adultery. From an order denying defendant’s motion to set aside tbe verdict and quasb tbe indictment and dismiss tbe same as to defendant, be appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
Tbe defendant was convicted of tbe crime of adultery and thereafter made a motion to set aside tbe verdict and to quasb and dismiss tbe indictment. This motion was denied and he appeals.
There is no “case” or bill of exceptions and tbe only question for decision is whether tbe indictment is sufficient to sustain tbe conviction.
Tbe statute under which tbe prosecution was brought (section 4951, R. L. 1905) provides that: “Whenever any married woman shall have sexual intercourse with a man, other than her husband, whether married or not, both shall be guilty of adultery, * * * but no…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- State v. GroomeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1860
- State v. HolmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- In re ClyneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Conley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Graham v. MiracleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- State v. ZirbesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
- State v. BeckNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.